Titan Self-Righting Anchor Swivel 1770KG - 3270KG Load Limit

Titan Self-Righting Anchor Swivel 1770KG - 3270KG Load Limit

0 review Write a Review

Self-Righting Anchor Swivel Self-Righting Anchor swivel is made of High Strength Stainless Steel, polished mirror finish. Product Features: Flip swivel - rotat…

SKU:

$530.00 - $798.00

Type / Load Limit: *

Current Stock:

Ask an Expert

Quantity:

Titan Self-Righting Anchor Swivel 1770KG - 3270KG Load Limit

$530.00 - $798.00

Choose Options

Titan Self-Righting Anchor Swivel 1770KG - 3270KG Load Limit

$530.00 - $798.00

Type / Load Limit *

Product Details

Product Details

Self-Righting Anchor Swivel

Self-Righting Anchor swivel is made of High Strength Stainless Steel, polished mirror finish.

Product Features:

Flip swivel - rotates anchor into the correct orientation if it retrieves over the bow upside down
Covers the size ranges from Rocna and Vulcan anchors 6kg through to 55kg
Highest work load of any self-righting swivel on the market
Will fit imperial and metric chain
unique in the market, meets the same load specs even in sideload
Stainless Steel Grade: 17-4PH which is stronger than 316 while still offering excellent corrosion resistance
Polished mirror finish
Hardware included: loctite hexagon socket set screws, allen key, installation instructions

Product Sizing Guide:

Disclaimer:

Swivels are a popular accessory helpful in reducing rode twists and allowing the anchor to be rotated upon retrieval. A swivel should be rated to the breaking strength of the chain ( not the working load ), and care must be taken to avoid cheap, poorly engineered, and badly built designs.

When installing, be sure the swivel cannot be subjected to a veering load and can rotate properly. We do not recommend attaching the fork of a swivel directly to the anchor shank. It is safer to put a few links of chain between the swivel and the anchor. If this is done, an articulating ball-andjoint-design is pointless, and an in-line rotating design will be of simpler construction and probably a better solution.